Five days after Punjab and Haryana High Court searching for “specific” replies, cleaning their standards at Haryana’s quota 75% in private work, the Government Government in a written statement cupped a query by stating that “it was for the country Haryana to respond to the problem”.
While indicating that the object and the reason for the quota bill Haryana said that orders would be “desired socially, economically, economically, and the environment, the center stated that only Haryana could explain whether this goal could be achieved through this legislation.
Meanwhile, this problem has now been referred to another bench after a Punjab judge and Haryana High Cource resigned from listening to this case.
During the hearing that day, the written statement submitted by RK Srivastava, Secretary of Stock, the Department of Legal Affairs, the Government of India, said, “The law made it mandatory for entrepreneurs in the state to provide 75 percent of work for local. Residents in connection with post like posts That’s where gross monthly salaries or wages are no more than Rs 30,000 or as notified by the state. The statement of the object and the reason the bill states that the entry of a large number of migrants competes for low paid jobs put a significant impact on local infrastructure and housing and leading to slum proliferation. This causes environmental and health problems that have been acute in the urban area Haryana that affect the quality of life and livelihoods Njadi the interests of the general public. “
That adds: “is whether the laws of this country have a reasonable correlation with objects and reasons that try to be achieved, suitable for Haryana countries to clarify this aspect and not Indian unity.”
On the answer to the wise requested by HC, the center, while not commenting, stating that Haryana’s state work from the Local Candidate Law, 2020 … became a state law, it was for respondents No. 1 (Haryana state) to respond in this matter.
Immediately after the justice bench Ajay Tewari and Justice Pankaj Jain, “to be included before several other benches which are one of us (Ajay Tewari, J) not members (from bench benches) after getting orders from Hon ‘cheating the main justice.”
This case is now registered to hear on March 10 before the Justice Augustine George division bench is still and justice Sandeep Moudgil.